Standing facts
- 08 engines · one evidence model
- 02 arenas · francophone Europe / Africa
- Entry from 2 minutes · free, no account needed
- Every engagement ends in a verdict , never a slide deck
- Fees anchored to value at stake · never consultant days
- Every instrument published blank · 33 rows in the public register
Liquidity is decided every week, not reported every quarter.
Which actions protect liquidity under uncertainty?
Cash is decided on optimism.
- 01
Short-term cash decisions are often made from static spreadsheets and optimistic assumptions.
- 02
Liquidity actions can protect cash while damaging margin, growth or trust.
- 03
Executives need a weekly view that reconciles, simulates and verifies realised value.
STREDGELAB response: decide liquidity on a tested twin, not a static sheet.
13 weeks, one liquidity bridge.
- 1Opening cash
- 2Receipts timing
- 3Payment commitmentsNEXT
- 4Interventions
- 5Closing liquidity
Every intervention is tested before the cash moves.
What this engine has passed.
- Internal gates passed
- 25/25
- Assurance rung
- L3 candidate
A gate is one internal technical check the engine must pass before its output is treated as signed: a reconciliation, a boundary condition, or a determinism-and-replay test. The count is gates passed of gates defined. Independent certification is pending across all engines.
Thirteen weeks, one covenant floor, three interventions.
A group must decide whether to draw on its revolving facility before quarter end. The twin runs the thirteen weeks on committed receipts and commitments, then tests each intervention before any cash moves.
| Opening cash | €12.0m |
|---|---|
| Receipts, timed | +€41.0m |
| Payment commitments | −€46.5m |
| Closing liquidity, no action | €6.5m |
| Covenant floorBreach of €1.5m at week 11 | €8.0m |
| Intervention 1 — collections on the top 20 accounts | +€1.8m |
| Intervention 2 — capital spend deferred one quarter | +€0.9m |
| Intervention 3 — supplier terms, two categories | +€0.4m |
| Closing liquidity, tested | €9.6m |
The breach clears on collections and deferral alone, with €1.6m of headroom above the floor. The facility draw is not required — and the twin says under which receipt slippage that conclusion reverses.
Deterministic engines. Governed outputs.
- Cash roll-forward engine
- Scenario and shock engine
- Intervention effects engine
- Reverse stress engine
- Variance and benefits engine
The evidence resolves to an outcome.
L3 candidate · 25/25 internal gates passed · independent certification pending
AI may explain, summarise, translate and draft from signed engine outputs. It cannot calculate authoritative values, select decision states, approve actions or alter audit records.
One decision. One verdict.
Bring us the decision. We build the evidence, and end on a verdict you can defend.
- ✓Protect minimum liquidity
- ✓Prioritise actions
- ✓Stress-test downside cases
- ✓Verify forecast-to-actual cash impact
The questions buyers actually ask.
Why thirteen weeks?
It is the horizon over which receipts and commitments are mostly known rather than forecast. Beyond it, a weekly cash view stops being evidence and becomes a projection, and the engine will not sign a projection.
Can it run without a treasury system?
Yes. It needs bank balances, the open receivables and payables ledgers, and the committed payment calendar. Where a category is estimated rather than committed, the output marks it and shows the decision's sensitivity to it.
What is the deliverable?
A signed weekly liquidity path, each intervention tested with its effect and its risk, and a stated reversal condition: the receipt slippage or payment acceleration that would change the verdict.
Evidence for your next high-stakes decision, starting with nine gates.
Subscribe to receive our evidence notes and decision briefings.